Interesting article by Daniel Engber in Slate, playing a thought experiment: What would happen in professional sports (particularly baseball) if leagues permitted, and stopped testing players for, performance-enhancing drugs?
It is an interesting question whether we should simply accept what medical technology (like other human advances) can offer our sports.
Worth a read.
Popular Posts
-
After a little over a week since 48 players exchanged numbers with their teams, and according to my research 13 players have signed if you i...
-
This is my opening post on my blog. This blog is going to be about the Media/ Sports/Music/Politicans. I hope ya'all find it interestin...
-
I am going ahead with the idea of facilitating barter exchanges between readers, chosing the old-school method in the interest of simplicit... -
Male porn stars are famous for their above average endowments. Ron Jeremy is measured at 9.75 inches. Another famous porn star was John Holm... -
I take what I call a journalistic interest in a variety of sports. If I didn't write, I wouldn't waste my time learning about them. ... -
Paula Radcliffe is a distance runner who hails from Britain. She is the first woman to ever go below 2:20 for the marathon redefining what w... -
Just wanted to thank everyone who has been apart, visited or entered our contests on this blog and help us get to 30,000. It's not quite...
-
Today's FT has a special report on Nigeria, and has a very interesting discussion of energy access : Despite average cash injections of...
0 comments:
Post a Comment