If you got here from the story in the Sunday Times looking to learn more about the IPCC and its claims about disasters and climate change, welcome.
For background, details and documentation of the issue, I suggest starting with these recent posts:
- A Primer on Egregious Errors in IPCC WG2 on Disasters (background and more links)
- What Does Pielke Think About This? (how the IPCC made up information about my views)
- Castles Built on Sand (what the unpublished report relied on by the IPCC actually said when published)
UPDATE 24 Jan: At the Telegraph Geoffry Lean misinterprets the significance of the disasters story, suggesting that it was about referencing a non-peer reviewed source. In fact it was about referencing a non-peer reviewed source to make a claim that was not true, and contrary to what the peer reviewed literature actually said (and what the non-peer reviewed source said when published).
Comments and questions are welcome, on this or other topics you find at the site.
0 comments:
Post a Comment