
Now, if we could just get rid of the NBA's new age floor, I would be truly content . . .
This is an interesting proposition to say the least. However, given the stance MLB takes toward gambling, legal or otherwise, I find it hard to believe that he would be allowed to actaully set odds for an offshore gambling site for two years and then return to MLB in any capacity, especially as the general manager of a team. I wonder, if Epstein were to take this job, and then attempt a comeback to MLB in the future, would his return be met with heavy opposition from the powers that be? Wouldn't it be somewhat hypocritical to ban from the game those who place bets on the lines, and then allow participation by those who actually set them?Terrific point. So maybe this isn't such a great opportunity for Epstein, unless he wants to walk away from the game for good. I know Larry Lucchino was tough to work for, but was he that tough?
The Player agrees to perform his services hereunder diligently and faithfully, to keep himself in first-class physical condition and to obey the Club's training rules, and pledges himself to the American public and to the Club to conform to high standards of personal conduct, fair play and good sportsmanshipI suspect if it is proved that Rodriguez is playing poker with those who also bet on baseball, the Yankees could more closely investigate the possibility of terminating his astronomical contract, or at least threatening to do so. Regularly mingling with those who bet on baseball may not "conform to high standards of personal conduct." It is also possible that Major League Baseball would intervene at that point, and threaten suspension. After the Pete Rose betting scandal, the MLB would seem to have little tolerance for those who associate with baseball bettors.
Rank | School | 75th | 75th | Class Size |
1 | Harvard University | 175 | 3.94 | 550 |
2 | Yale University | 175 | 3.96 | 200 |
3 | Columbia University | 173 | 3.83 | 400 |
4 | New York University | 172 | 3.85 | 400 |
5 | Stanford University | 172 | 3.94 | 150 |
6 | University of Virginia | 171 | 3.82 | 350 |
7 | University of Pennsylvania | 171 | 3.81 | 250 |
8 | University of Chicago | 171 | 3.78 | 200 |
9 | Georgetown University | 170 | 3.80 | 450 |
10 | Northwestern University | 170 | 3.78 | 200 |
Class size (rounded to the nearest 50) served as a tie breaker: the larger school with the same LSAT credentials was ranked higher.I hadn't thought of class size that way, but it makes a lot of sense. If Harvard Law School and Yale Law School students are essentially of "equal quality" (which Leiter's numbers suggest), then Harvard Law School appears "stronger" by featuring a class 3 times larger than that of Yale Law School. Moreover, there are a lot more Harvard Law grads than Yale Law grads, and if the two groups are indeed equal, then a Harvard Law degree would seem to have greater professional value just by virtue of enjoying more alumns in "prestigious" positions, as well as enhanced fundraising opportunities.
For Harvard to boast a 75th percentile LSAT of 175, just like Yale, requires Harvard to recruit nearly three times as many students as Yale with those credentials. That speaks both to Harvard’s attractiveness, and to the existence at Harvard of an enormous pool of highly credentialed students, a fact, needless to say, that prospective employers register.