Many lawyers are familiar with a "poison pill" in corporate law, which are defensive measures intended to prevent hostile takeovers through stock acquisition. (More) Now, the NFL has its own measure of the poison pill and an arbiter will decide on Monday how integral it is to a player contract. (Story). Steve Hutchinson of the Seattle Seahawks, widely considered to be one of the best guards in the league, signed a 7-year $49 million dollar contract with the Minnesota Vikings last weekend. The Seahawks have the right to match the deal, and want to do so, but the Vikings have included a "poison pill" clause.
- [The clause] stipulates that Hutchinson must be the highest paid offensive lineman on his team after the first year of the contract and that, if he isn't, the entire contract becomes guaranteed. The provision is a difficult one for the Seahawks, who have the right to match the Minnesota offer, because offensive tackle Walter Jones is the team's highest paid lineman and would be even if Hutchinson were on the Seattle roster.
Less than 2 percent of NFL contracts are fully guaranteed and those are usually limited to quarterbacks or other players at skill positions. Having to guarantee Hutchinson's contract would break new ground.
My guess is that this is not a winning argument, but it will be interesting to see how the arbiter (Professor Stephen Burbank) views it. Is the clause solely a defensive measure, and thus, something for which Hutchinson has given no consideration? Or is it part of his compensation package? He does not stand to make more money; the clause is more likely to prevent action on the part of the Vikings. But having his contract be guaranteed would be a huge gain.
UPDATE (3/21): Seahawks lose; Hutchinson is now a Viking.
0 comments:
Post a Comment