Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Mushroom Picking Season?

Portland Design Works Bamboo/Cork Bar-End Plugs
Just got these in the mail and they looked so ridiculously season-appropriate that I had to share! One of the cutest bicycle accessories I've seen in some time and certainly worth the $10 price tag, these tiny objects are cork and bamboo bar-end plugs from Portland Design Works. They look like miniature mushrooms and are so nice that I almost don't want to install them on my bike.

I like to use wine corks to plug the ends of handlebars, preferring their organic warmth to the cold look and feel of plastic and metal plugs. But I ran out of corks and didn't want to have to drink more wine - so I looked around online and found these delightful creations. They are practically weightless, if you care about that sort of thing, and are made in both drop and upright handlebar diameters. Just lovely all around.

Since my Rivendell no longer has bar-end shifters and my other roadbike is a fixed gear, I will probably order another set and install these on both. What are you using for bar-end plugs these days? I've tried lots of different things at this point, but keep coming back to corky/woodsy stuff - it just feels nicer.

Stephen Fry Interview

Intense Single Tasking

Multitasking is out. Turns out this badge of honor from the ’90s is more fiction than fact. Our brains don’t multitask, they just rapidly switch between tasks, sometimes fast enough for us to believe we’re doing many things at once. Problem is, every time we switch, there is a “ramping cost” in your brain, it takes anywhere from a few second to 15 minutes for your brain to fully re-engage. This makes you feel insanely busy, but simultaneously craters productivity, creativity and increases feelings of anxiety and stress.

Multitasking also requires you to hold a lot of information in your working memory, which is controlled by a part of the brain known as the prefrontal cortex (PFC). But the PFC is also responsible for will-power, and for keeping fear and anxiety in check. Multitasking increases the “cognitive load” on the PFC, overwhelming it and effectively killing it’s ability to keep fear, anxiety and the taunt of distraction at bay.

Simple solution–just say no. Do one thing at a time in intense, short bursts.


JONATHAN FIELDS

I don't believe in multitasking. It doesn't work. I have a friend at work who disagrees with me. He says he has no choice. But I use my method, and it works. He uses his method and fucks shit up. His reputation is that of a fuck up. It isn't because he is stupid or incompetent. He simply multitasks and fails.

I do what I call IST or intense single tasking. The goal of multitasking is to get things done faster. In practice, this doesn't happen. You can point this out to people, cite research on the subject, and explain why it doesn't work. This will not deter them. This is because they see no alternative. IST is the alternative.

What I do is simple. I focus intensely on single tasks and do them as quickly as possible until completion. Things that are automatic I leave to themselves like a microwave meal. It is amazingly effective as I rip through tasks. Unlike multitasking, I feel the rush as I run out of things to do.

When I multitask, the opposite happens. I shift from one thing to another and back again. I'm here. I'm there. One or two of the tasks I am juggling crashes to the earth. I become frustrated. The irony is that I am better than many others at doing it. But I am not better than when I single task.

It takes discipline to do IST. It goes against your instincts. It requires that you outright ignore some things and even some people. But when you start doing it, those people may be mad but only for a short period. This is because you can please everyone. You just can't please everyone at the same time.

At the computer, it is the same thing. Close that Facebook window. You only get two windows open at one time. This assumes you clinked a link in the first window. Read or deal with whatever is in the second window. Then, return to the first window. You will find that you read more stuff.

The car is where I fail. I eat in the car, and I used to talk on the cellphone behind the wheel while eating and listening to music. The result was bad driving, bad eating, and a person on the other end of the line wondering what I was saying between bites of food and Bachman Turner Overdrive. Basically, you get to do two things in the vehicle. You get to drive, and you get to listen to the radio. A cup of coffee is permitted. No phone calls. Hang up and drive. If someone calls, you have two choices. Finish your drive, or pull over and call them back. The best thing I find to do is call them back as soon as the drive ends. Park the car in your spot and return all calls unless nature is calling. Keep the calls short and sweet. Explain to them that you were driving, and you have finished driving. I haven't had one person tell me that I was a dick for this. I have heard people frustrated with the multitasking approach. Plus, calls are most often dropped while in a moving vehicle.

Multitasking is the illusion that you can increase time and productivity through layering. You can't. You are finite. Time and productivity are increased through focus and speed not layering. Intense single tasking decreases stress and makes people happier. You get more done.

Sam Harris on the Future of the Book

Where publishing is concerned, the Internet is both midwife and executioner. It has never been easier to reach large numbers of readers, but these readers have never felt more entitled to be informed and entertained for free. I have been very slow to appreciate these developments, and yet it is clear even to me that there are reasons to fear for the life of the printed book. Needless to say, many of the changes occurring in publishing are changes that neither publishers nor authors want. The market for books is continually shifting beneath our feet, and nobody knows what the business of publishing will look like a decade from now.

The Future of the Book

This is a brilliant essay and a rumination on what the future of publishing will be. Like it or not, that future is digital. Is the book dead?

Right now, I am writing a book. I could just as easily post the chapters as blog posts, and I think about that as I write them. But they don't work as blog posts. The chapters cannot stand alone. They are like bricks in a structure which would make no sense on their own but make sense in the context of the book. The chapters build on the previous chapters. If you only got one, it would feel incomplete, and you would feel cheated.

Sam Harris is pondering how authors can get paid in this new digital landscape. I think he is asking the wrong question. Bloggers like Seth Godin, Tim Ferriss, and Leo Babauta manage to get paid. They aren't rich like a Stephen King, but they show you can make a living from writing. The internet has actually made things more accessible to writers that would otherwise have no shot. The question is not how writers will get paid. The question is how big shot writers along the lines of Stephen King and J.K. Rowling can continue to be rich. The answer is that they won't. Rock stars are the first major casualty of this revolution. Big time writers are right behind them.

The reason that all these creative types became rich is because of intellectual property laws. Copyright enabled someone other than the creator to own the work, publish it, and distribute it. Publishers and record companies were notorious in their dealings with talent. Then, their competitive advantage vanished with the internet. The IP cartel was broken.

The upside of this new order is that creative types have the means of distribution and production in their hands. The downside is that there is little chance of them getting paid for it. Just yesterday, I had an online conversation with an aspiring novelist wanting to be widely read but also get paid for it. I told him that he could not have both. If success is measured in eyeballs, it is very easy to become a successful writer. If success is measured in money, it isn't going to happen.

Joseph Schumpeter called this process "creative destruction." New orders in the marketplace displace the old orders. This is why I tell people that the future is not online in terms of making money but in the physical realm. People who produce food, build structures, maintain cars, and all the rest are the ones who are going to command premium pay. Why is this? Because no one wants to do this work anymore. I know because I see it now. This is why jet mechanics now command higher pay than jet pilots. No one wants to turn those wrenches. The pay has increased to try and attract people into these unglamorous but necessary careers.

The difference between blue collar work and the work of the mind is that blue collar work is not scalable while intellectual work is. Under an IP regime, scalable creative work can make you rich as fuck. This is because you can spend a year writing a novel like The Stand and then sit on your ass collecting royalties for that year of work for the rest of your life. But when you are a rock star getting decimated by online piracy, you get your old ass up and start touring and selling tickets to shows. There is a reason all these geezers are out there on the road, and it isn't personal enjoyment. They need the money. Hell, many of these rockers hate each other's guts, but they put up with each other to make a buck. Welcome to the real world of work, motherfuckers.

All intellectual work depends on protectionism for its income. It could be a license for a doctor or a lawyer or an engineer. It could be copyright for a writer or a patent for an inventor. But the real moat for these castles came from the cost of distribution and production. That marginal cost is now virtually zero. In the long run, there is no protection for intellectual property. It is eroding. Publishers are the next to die followed by universities and movie studios.

What is the future for the workers of the mind? The answer to that is they will have to go back to their day jobs. Guys like Sam Harris are going to have to get a job in a restaurant working the grill. I already see this with rock stars. They can drive a bus and listen to music, or they can ride in a bus and play the music each night. But the pay won't be that much different. The tragedy is not a cost to culture but the erosion of personal fortunes. I think that is wonderful. This is the way it should be.

IUKL World Championships Gold to Uddevalla Kettlebell Club (in the news)

As mentioned previously, Niclas Gonzalez of Uddevalla Kettlebells, won a first place in long cycle at the IUKL World Championships in the United States two weeks ago. The link below leads to a news article in Bohuslänningen (in Swedish), and there is also a movie where you can watch some nice lockouts: LÄNK


LCCJ

LC 2x20kg: 5
LC 2x24kg: 5
LC 2x28kg: 5 hunar
LC 2x32kg: 3
LC 2x30kg: 5,10


Today was the first lc-session in a while. The 10rep set with 30s was nice, cardio was terrible and there were some press-outs last reps. Nonethelss, it felt good to a slightly longer set (I wont tell how long it took :-).